The following link details a case where a mother was awarded a substantial award against CPS for abuse of power in her case. If this mother won a case against a social services agency, there are many thousands more mothers out there who can do the same thing because the circumstances in all of the cases are similar if not identical. The only difference in most cases is the names of the people involved and the location of the cases.
http://www.prweb.com/releases/Fogarty-Hardwick/social_services/prweb4157254.htm
Monday, September 26, 2011
Mom wins substantial award against CPS abuse of power
Posted by Denise Dopkins at 3:56 PM 0 comments
Labels: children for profit, civil rights violations, CPS abuse of power, CPS horror stories, CPS legal kidnapping, cps reform, Family court judges withhold due process, foster-adopt industry
Article describing the coercive nature of CPS
The following link will lead you to an article that explains the coercive nature of CPS. They use coercion and intimidation tactics to get parents to relinquish their parental rights so the child can be adopted out to strangers for profit. The article is authored by Jan Smith on Facebook.
http://washingtonstateextendedfamilies.com/COERSION.htm
Posted by Denise Dopkins at 3:24 PM 0 comments
Labels: children for profit, civil rights violations, CPS abuse of power, CPS fraudulent adoptions, CPS horror stories, CPS legal kidnapping, Family court judges withhold due process, foster-adopt industry
Wednesday, March 23, 2011
CPS Live Buzz Interviews Doctor About Psych Evaluations
Is this an accurate depiction of CPS or what?! So very many parents are railroaded by CPS social workers by way of their contracted parrots-- I mean 'treatment providers'.
Posted by Denise Dopkins at 10:49 PM 0 comments
Labels: children for profit, civil rights violations, corrupt social workers, CPS abuse of power, CPS legal kidnapping, Family court judges withhold due process, foster-adopt industry
Tuesday, March 15, 2011
Railroad: The road traveled most by parents involved with CPS
Nothing can be more heart-wrenching than the loss of a child. For that reason, kidnappings mobilize entire communities to search for the missing and comfort the victimized families. In high-profile cases, such as that of Elizabeth Smart, the entire nation watches. Amber Alert systems notify police and private citizens to watch for the perpetrators. Yet, when CPS is the culprit/criminal, nothing is done to rescue the child from its kidnappers. It is merely assumed that the parent has committed some kind of abuse or neglect toward their children. If that can't be proven or even asserted, CPS and its cohorts just assert what they refer to as "risk of harm" by the parent/caregiver of the child. Then, its Department contracted 'treatment providers' parrot what CPS wants to accomplish. The parent is generally 'diagnosed' with a fake mental or personality disorder. Given the fact that they are allowed to drag the innocent parents into a fake court that provides nearly zero Due Process, the parents are afforded no justice.
The fact of the matter is that child abuse or purposeful neglect is a crime, however, parents are often times not charged with a crime because they are truly innocent of wrongdoing and there is no evidence of such a charge. CPS and family courts get away with bringing a civil case against the parent and drumming up the hanky defense: that the child is at risk of harm due to allegations that he/she has mental health problems severe enough to warrant the permanent termination of parental rights. They bring the civil case because it requires considerably less evidence or reason to separate parents from their children. That is all it takes in order for CPS to accomplish the permanent traumatizing of an entire family... all for the sake of the almighty dollar. (and generally with the assistance of Court Appointed lawyers that do NOT aggressively defend their clients against the abuses committed by CPS and judges.) Most of the 'professionals' within the CPS and family court system make their living by processing children like cattle. Doctors, therapists, social workers, supervisors, lawyers, AAG's, Gaurdian ad litems, visitation note takers, visitation transporters, judges, court commissioners, even foster parents seeking to adopt the children they are paid to care for while the parents desperately try to rescue their children from foster-incarceration. It is the foster-adopt industry. Yes, I said industry, because that is exactly what it is. The list seems never ending. The bureaucratic bully CPS will never cease this horrific and criminal behavior if they are never held accountable for their deeds. Listen people... kidnapping and fraudulent testimony are criminal. Why are state agents and fake court commissioners and judges allowed to commit such crimes and escape punishment? They are criminals. This needs to be remedied. Parents everywhere need to wake up and yell until we are heard. CPS is an unconstitutional financial empire built on separating loving, non abusive families in order to receive government financial bonuses and to sell the children like merchandise to foster-adopt couples desiring to adopt. CPS even has its own state contracted lawyers specifically to represent and facilitate these adoptions directly out of the foster care pool. Thus, it is much less expensive if not free to the perspective adoptive parents to file for the adoptions. Certainly less expensive than applying to a private adoption agency.
Please view the following videos of former Senator Nancy Schaefer regarding the corrupt business of Child Protective Services.
Below are the links to the videos on YouTube...
Part 1 - www.youtube.com/watch?v=IOx5Q5ekPxk&feature=player_embedded
Part 2 - www.youtube.com/watch?v=TfWEQEm9GJk&feature=player_embedded
Part 3 - www.youtube.com/watch?v=V1HnWqy_0yM&feature=player_embedded
Part 4 - www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dg-N9tT6OtY&feature=player_embedded
Feel free to pass along - we need to get the word out!!!!
Posted by Denise Dopkins at 7:59 PM 0 comments
Labels: children for profit, civil rights violations, CPS abuse of power, CPS horror stories, CPS legal kidnapping, Family court judges withhold due process, foster care industry
Friday, January 7, 2011
Just another child protection racket (scheme)
The following article was authored by Pam Roach and can be located on her own blog as well. Just click on her name above and it will take you to her blog. Lots of wonderful and eye opening information there too.
Tuesday, January 4, 2011
CPS: Escapes Budget Cuts
Citing the need to protect children, Gov. Gregoire recently told the press that CPS would not take budget cuts. I am the first to agree that not enough is being done to protect children. Just read the headlines to see how many cases are gone neglected by the department. (CPS) But, on the other end of the spectrum, children are being taken without cause. No budget cuts means the system of taking children for adoption will continue, unabated, during the budget shortage. Here is a grandma comment just posted. This story is one repeated often.
Loving Grandma Writes:
"The job of the CPS worker is to build the most damning report she can to justify the removal of the children. I have read the report on my son and his wife, who were not allowed to bring their newborn home from the hospital because of the alleged possibility of neglect. The descriptions in the CPS report bear only a vague resemblance to my real-life son and daughter-in-law. The report paints such a misleading picture of the situation that it would be no help to Senator Roach or to anyone who wanted to know the true story."
Senator Pam Roach states the following:
"Today in Olympia I received two calls from CPS involved families. All were pleading for help from a government that has lied to take children. I am sure there are some cases where the department is correct in their actions....I wonder if Secretary Denise Revels Robinson has gotten the "taking rate" down like she said she would."
"Session starts Janurary 10th. I will be ready."
Posted by Denise Dopkins at 6:45 PM 0 comments
Labels: children for profit, civil rights violations, CPS incompetency, CPS legal kidnapping, Family court judges withhold due process, foster care industry, untruthful state agents
Sunday, November 21, 2010
Just another cover up effort by DSHS/DCFS/CPS
A Must Read: Click on the following highlighted link
http://www.washingtonstatewire.com/home/5270-how_to_compound_the_problems_within_dshs_privatize_children_s_services.htm
Posted by State Senator Pam Roach at 10:46 AM 0 comments
Posted by Denise Dopkins at 7:18 PM 0 comments
Labels: children for profit, civil rights violations, CPS abuse of power, CPS legal kidnapping, Family court judges withhold due process, Lying social workers, Washington State DCFS corruption
Wednesday, November 17, 2010
How to deal with CPS invasion of your family
November 8, 2010
Authored by Linda Martin
CPS Problems? Here Are 7 Ways to Fight CPS…
If you’re appalled by the actions of CPS, here are some ideas for correcting the injustices:
1. Write a letter to each and every member of your county board of supervisors detailing actions that show illegal activities or injustice on the part of local caseworkers. Suggest that they cut the CPS budget if caseworkers are taking children who shouldn’t be separated from their parents. Suggest that these illegal and unjust activities could cause the county to have to deal with expensive lawsuits. Follow this up by regularly attending meetings of the county board of supervisors and by getting up to share during community participation time; use your three minutes to tell people what’s going on.
2. Write a letter to your state legislators (don’t bother with the federal legislators – they’re usually worthless and corrupt unless they’re Ron Paul or someone exactly like him.) Go for the state level legislators. Tell them that child welfare is mismanaged in your county. Then follow up by going to the capitol to try to have a face to face encounter with these legislators. Take with you a gift-offering of a folder you’ve prepared with lots of information about how corrupt and evil CPS is. Tell them you support the State Sovereignty Movement and that federal child welfare laws are a violation of the U.S. Constitution’s Tenth Amendment.
3. Study your state’s social services regulations. You should be able to find a copy at your local county law library. Ask the librarian there for help finding them. If you have an open CPS case take notes on every regulation that’s being violated by your caseworker. Get photocopies of the regulations that are violated. Next, review your court order to see what orders may be violated by the caseworker. If you find discrepancies you can file for a state administrative hearing.
4. Does your county have a Grand Jury? If so, write them a letter, not about your personal case so much as about the problems of CPS injustice in general. Ask them to investigate CPS in your county.
5. If you haven’t already, write a Legal Declaration to clarify each point of malfeasance by caseworkers and others involved in your case. As when writing any letter or legal document, NEVER include any self-incriminating type of statement. Give this to your attorney. If he won’t see you in person, mail it to him and request (1) a response, and (2) that it be presented to the judge for the next hearing.
6. If your caseworker’s report to the court contains inaccurate statements, misrepresentations, or lies, create a legal document called “Objections and Corrections to the Report of the Social Worker” and as with the Legal Declaration, send it to your lawyer to be presented to the court.
Links to legal documents samples are here: Legal Document and Information Library.
7. If your caseworker is violating your court order or state social service regulations, treating you disrespectfully, or in any other way doing something you believe is wrong, write a letter to the county personnel department with a detailed complaint about the person. This will probably keep the caseworker from ever getting a promotion in that county. He or she might also get demoted, or fired.
I hope you find some solutions that will work for you.
cps child protective services social workers
Filed under: http://www.fightcps.com/
Posted by Denise Dopkins at 9:34 AM 0 comments
Labels: children for profit, civil rights violations, CPS abuse of power, CPS legal kidnapping, Family court judges withhold due process, untruthful state agents
Wednesday, October 27, 2010
CPS defined
(From Dictionary.com)
OPPRESSIVE
op·pres·sive /əˈprɛsɪv/ Show Spelled
[uh-pres-iv] Show IPA
–adjective
1. burdensome, unjustly harsh, or tyrannical: an oppressive king; oppressive laws.
2. causing discomfort by being excessive, intense, elaborate, etc.: oppressive heat.
3. distressing or grievous: oppressive sorrows.
Opposites of oppressive: cool, mild, temperate
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(From Yourdictionary.com)
Definition of COERCE
COERCE (coercive)
co·erce vt \kō-ˈərs\
co·ercedco·erc·ing
1: to restrain or dominate by force
2: to compel to an act or choice
3: to achieve by force or threat
— co·erc·ible\-ˈər-sə-bəl\ adjective
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TERRORIZE
ter·ror·ize (ter′ər īz′)
transitive verb terrorized -·ized′, terrorizing -·iz′·ing
1.to fill with terror; terrify
2.to coerce, make submit, etc. by filling with terror, as by the use or threat of violence
Related Forms:
•terrorization ter′·rori·za′·tion noun
Opposites of Terrorize: assuage, calm, help, please, encourage, hearten, inspirit
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(From Yourdictionary.com)
TYRANNICAL
ty·ran·ni·cal (tə ran′i kəl, ti-, tī-)
adjective
1.of or suited to a tyrant; arbitrary; despotic
2.harsh, cruel, unjust, oppressive, etc.
Origin: L tyrannicus < Gr tyrannikos
Also tyrannic ty·ran′·nic
Related Forms:
•tyrannically ty·ran′·ni·cally adverb
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(From Yourdictionary.com)
ABUSE (abusive)
transitive verb abused abused′, abusing abus′·ing
1.to use wrongly; misuse: to abuse a privilege
2.a.to hurt by treating badly; mistreat
b.to inflict physical, sexual, or psychological harm upon
3.to use insulting, coarse, or bad language about or to; revile
Origin: ME abusen < OFr abuser < L abusus, pp. of abuti, misuse < ab-, away, from + uti, to use
noun
1.wrong, bad, or excessive use
2.mistreatment, esp. by the infliction of physical, sexual, or psychological harm; injury
3.a bad, unjust, or corrupt custom or practice
4.insulting or coarse language
5.Obsolete deception
Abuse antonyms: aid, help, preservation, respect
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FRAUD (fraudulent)
World English Dictionary
fraud (frɔːd)
— n
1. deliberate deception, trickery, or cheating intended to gain an advantage
2. an act or instance of such deception
3. something false or spurious: his explanation was a fraud
4. informal a person who acts in a false or deceitful way
[C14: from Old French fraude , from Latin fraus deception]
Collins English Dictionary - Complete & Unabridged 10th Edition
2009 © William Collins Sons & Co. Ltd. 1979, 1986 © HarperCollins
Publishers 1998, 2000, 2003, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2009
Cite This Source
Word Origin; History
fraud
"criminal deception," mid-14c., from O.Fr. fraude , from L. fraudem (nom. fraus ) "deceit, injury." The noun meaning "impostor, humbug" is attested from 1850. Pious fraud "deception practiced for the sake of what is deemed a good purpose" is from 1560s.
Online Etymology Dictionary, © 2010 Douglas Harper
Cite This Source
Legal Dictionary
Main Entry: fraud
Function: noun
Etymology: Latin fraud - fraus
1 a : any act, expression, omission, or concealment calculated to deceive another to his or her disadvantage; specifically : a misrepresentation or concealment with reference to some fact material to a transaction that is made with knowledge of its falsity or in reckless disregard of its truth or falsity and with the intent to deceive another and that is reasonably relied on by the other who is injured thereby b : the affirmative defense of having acted in response to a fraud
2 : the crime or tort of committing fraud fraud > —see also MISREPRESENTATION
NOTE: A tort action based on fraud is also referred to as an action of deceit.
actual fraud
fraud committed with the actual intent to deceive and thereby injure another called also fraud in fact —compare CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD in this entry
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DISHONEST
dis·hon·est (ds-nst)
adj.
1. Disposed to lie, cheat, defraud, or deceive.
2. Resulting from or marked by a lack of honesty.
[Middle English dishoneste, dishonorable, from Old French deshoneste, probably from Medieval Latin *dishonestus : Latin dis-, dis- + Latin honestus, honorable; see honest.]
dis·honest·ly adv.
Synonyms: dishonest, lying, untruthful, deceitful, mendacious
These adjectives mean lacking honesty or truthfulness. Dishonest is the least specific: a dishonest business executive.
Lying conveys a blunt accusation of untruth: a lying witness giving inconsistent testimony.
Untruthful is a softer term and suggests lack of veracity and divergence from fact: made an untruthful statement.
Deceitful implies misleading by falsehood or by concealment of the truth: deceitful advertising.
Mendacious is more formal than lying, and suggests a chronic inclination toward untruth: a mendacious and troublesome employee.
The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition copyright ©2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Updated in 2009. Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(From Dictionary.com)
KIDNAPPERS
kid·nap /ˈkɪdnæp/ Show Spelled
[kid-nap] Show IPA
–verb (used with object), -napped or -naped, -nap·ping or -nap·ing.
to steal, carry off, or abduct by force or fraud, esp. for use as a hostage or to extract ransom.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(From Dictionary.com)
CRUEL
/ˈkruəl/ Show Spelled
[kroo-uhl] Show IPA
–adjective, -er, -est.
1. willfully or knowingly causing pain or distress to others.
2. enjoying the pain or distress of others: the cruel spectators of the gladiatorial contests.
3. causing or marked by great pain or distress: a cruel remark; a cruel affliction.
4. rigid; stern; strict; unrelentingly severe.
Origin:
1175–1225; ME < AF, OF < L crūdēlis, equiv. to crūd ( us ) ( see crude) + -ēlis adj. suffix
—Related forms
cru·el·ly, adverb
cru·el·ness, noun
un·cru·el, adjective
un·cru·el·ly, adverb
un·cru·el·ness, noun
—Synonyms
1. bloodthirsty, ferocious, merciless, relentless. Cruel, pitiless, ruthless, brutal, savage imply readiness to cause pain to others. Cruel implies willingness to cause pain, and indifference to suffering: a cruel stepfather. Pitiless adds the idea of refusal to show compassion: pitiless to captives. Ruthless implies cruelty and unscrupulousness, letting nothing stand in one's way: ruthless greed. Brutal implies cruelty that takes the form of physical violence: a brutal master. Savage suggests fierceness and brutality: savage battles.
Antonym: Kind or kindness
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(From Yourdictionary.com)
DESTROY (destructive)
de·stroy (di stro̵i′)
transitive verb
1.to tear down; demolish
2.to break up or spoil completely; ruin
3.to bring to total defeat; crush
4.to put an end to; do away with
5.to kill
6.to neutralize the effect of
7.to make useless
Origin: ME destroien < OFr destruire < L destruere < de-, down + struere, to build: see structure
Antonyms: Build, conserve, sustain
Posted by Denise Dopkins at 9:16 AM 0 comments
Labels: children for profit, civil rights violations, CPS abuse of power, CPS horror stories, CPS legal kidnapping, Family court judges withhold due process
Sunday, October 10, 2010
A Woman with 20 different personalities
Kim Noble: A woman divided
This blog's author Denise Dopkins first comments on the following article post. I post the article because it demonstrates how cruel and unjust the system really is. CPS succeeded at convincing a judge to permanently terminate the relationship between my precious baby boy and me. Their reason: They assert that I am so emotionally disturbed that it precludes me from the right to raise my son and live the joy that comes from the mother-child bonding experience. (Read more of my story "My Nightmare with CPS" located on this blog site. It is the May 31st entry under the blog archives.)I wish for everyone to know that I was not diagnosed with any serious mental health problems... and certainly not as profoundly disturbing as the woman in the following article. Yet, social services allowed her to have custody and care of her daughter despite her serious mental health condition. Social services refused to allow my son to continue on in his relationship and bonding experience with his natural mother for no legitiamate reason and absent the provision of in home services. The woman in the following article was granted the in home services and ongoing therapy while her daughter remained in her custody and care-- where she remains to this day. I on the other hand was deprived of any in home services or ongoing therapy with my son in my care and custody. I wasn't so much as given the chance to fail or succeed with my son.
KIM NOBLE: A woman devided
There is no trace of disturbance in her voice either - she is breezy and animated. She could even pass for normal if you met her on the street but Kim, 45, has spent the last 10 years coming to terms with the condition dissociative identity disorder (DID) and in the last two, she and 12 of her "alters" have started
painting in acrylics after a short time with an art therapist.
Despite no formal training, all the artists have developed their own distinctive styles, colours and themes and she has had seven successful solo and seven group exhibitions. She is now artist in residence at Springfield University Hospital in Tooting, south London, and wants to show the positive side of her condition to explain her art. This is the reason for our meeting.
Posted by Denise Dopkins at 6:17 PM 0 comments
Labels: children for profit, civil rights violations, corrupt social workers, CPS abuse of power, CPS horror stories, CPS incompetency, CPS legal kidnapping, Family court judges withhold due process
Sunday, September 19, 2010
Mom wins lawsuit against CPS
California Court of Appeal Affirms Mom's $4.9 Million Award Against Social Services Agency
RE: Fogarty-Hardwick v. County of Orange, et al.
Superior Court of California, County of Orange
Case No. 01CC02379 (Trial before Hon. Ronald L. Bauer, Dept. CX103)
In 2007 an Orange County jury returned a $4.9 million verdict in favor of Deanna Fogarty-Hardwick finding that county social workers had lied to the juvenile court in order to cause the removal of Fogarty-Hardwick's young children - 6 and 9 years old at the time. In a unanimous scathing opinion issued Monday, June 14, 2010, Division Three of the Fourth District Court of Appeal noted that the evidence presented at trial led both the judge and jury to conclude that "something seriously wrong had been done to Fogarty-Hardwick" and that the conduct of the social workers was not "an isolated incident." The Court of Appeal went on to chastise the County saying "This conclusion is something that should be taken very seriously.
In this case, the jury specifically concluded that Vreeken and Dwojak lied, falsified evidence, and suppressed exculpatory evidence...There was no error in rejecting qualified immunity in this case.
San Diego, CA (PRWEB) June 18, 2010
A California Appellate Court found this week against Orange County and its Social Services Agency, and Affirmed what is called a “Substantial” damages award arising from a Civil Rights Verdict obtained in May 2007.
After in depth review of extensive briefs and a complex record, Division Three of the Fourth District Court of Appeal for the State of California issues its opinion today affirming an Orange County jury’s verdict awarding Deanna Fogarty-Hardwick approximately $4.9 million against the County of Orange, and two of its social workers.
In its opinion, the Court of Appeal voiced its concerns over what happened to Ms. Fogarty-Hardwick: “Stated plainly, the outcome of this case cannot be dismissed as merely the unfortunate product of a runaway jury. The evidence adduced at trial obviously caused both the jury and the judge to conclude not only that something seriously wrong was done to Fogarty-Hardwick in this case, but also that the wrongful conduct was not an isolated incident. That conclusion is something the County should be taking very seriously.”
The underlying case was filed by Deanna Fogarty-Hardwick against the County of Orange in February 2001. The suit alleged that Orange County, social worker Marcia Vreeken and her supervisor Helen Dwojak violated Ms. Fogarty-Hardwick’s constitutional rights to raise and associate with her children free from governmental interference.
On March 23,2007 an Orange County Jury found against Orange County, social worker Marcia Vreeken, and social worker supervisor Helen Dwojak and awarded monetary damages of $4.9 million. A third social worker, Elaine Wilkins was found not liable.
Lead attorney Shawn A. McMillan states: “Ms. Fogarty is very pleased with the Court of Appeal’s decision to uphold the verdict. This case encompasses extremely important issues for the people of Orange County, and the People of the State of California. Allegations of social worker misconduct of the type proven in this case is "ubiquitous" as admitted in an Amicus Brief filed by the California Association of Counties. Hopefully, the 52 counties that belong to the association will take note of the outcome of this case and promulgate policies to prevent their social workers from engaging in this type of conduct in the future.”
San Diego Lawyer Shawn A. McMillan, of the Law Offices of Shawn A. McMillan, was lead trial counsel in the case and the lead appellate attorney. Attorney Sondra Sutherland was co-counsel at trial and assisted on the appeal.
For additional information, contact:
Shawn A. McMillan, Esq.
The Law Offices of Shawn A. McMillan, A.P.C.
4955 Via Lapiz
San Diego, California 92122
Telephone: (858) 646-0069
Facsimile: (206) 600-4582
Website: www.mcmillan-law.com
http://www.prweb.com/releases/Fogarty-Hardwick/social_services/prweb4157254.htm
This needs to be applied nation-wide, because CPS agents operate in the same identical manner EVERYWHERE. This agency needs to be sued out of existence and the agents tried for their Capital Crimes against American families.
Posted by Denise Dopkins at 4:21 PM 2 comments
Labels: children for profit, civil rights violations, corrupt social workers, CPS abuse of power, CPS legal kidnapping, Family court judges withhold due process
Sunday, September 5, 2010
Corrupt Government
BELIEFS V FACTS ON CHILD PROTECTION
HOW THE GOVERNMENT IS USING SOCIAL ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION IN POOR COMMUNITIES
By Jan Smith
Words. It is all about words that create images and emotions to provoke some type of response leading to action. Advertisers use underhanded and enticing strategies continuously in the marketplace manipulating the consumer into believing that the presented offerings are a “must have.” Once purchased, the consumer may very quickly realize that what they bought and what was advertised are two different things. In sales, the enticement is often referred to as a carrot and the same principle is applied with convincing the general public that the current child protection system is in the “best interest” of the children. The carrot is supposed child safety using images of suffering children eliciting fear and the natural need to protect them from harm. Is the system set up protecting or exploiting children and now that 30 years have gone by since CAPTA, what are the results? In order to understand what we are experiencing now, it is critical to know what was happening that created this trend. Many factors enter into the picture including and not limited to government research into mind control and social construction theories. Psychiatrists, psychologists, philosophers, historians, doctors, and pharmaceutical companies all participated in discussions and experiments regarding individual and community control during the time that child protection federal public policy was being requested.
As early as the 50s, pharmaceutical giant Eli Lilly and Company began handing out LSD like it was candy to unsuspecting victims to determine its ability to get information out of resistant people and whether it was reliable in mind control. Many doctors were guilty of putting implants in their client’s brains attempting to manipulate emotions then tracking them unbeknownst to them. Nobody was immune to that era’s determination to commit human rights violations to include military personnel, children, and mentally handicapped people.
Yale and Harvard doctors participated and set up top secret mind control experimental stations of all types and varieties at the request of government paid for with tax dollars. It was in this spirit and social climate at Yale that the child protection federal public policy was developed then implemented across the nation without public input. Three scholars from Yale, Goldstein, Solnit and Freud, wrote a book, “Beyond the Best Interest of the Child” that is the bible of family dependency court to this day. The book encourages fast, reckless and uninformed removal and adoption out of children. The authors further suggest that judges should have no human sensitivities to the victims they may create and to plow forth ignoring any and all objections. Horrified, parents and extended families finding their children removed and adopted out needlessly, discover deaf ears in every direction. Let the philosophy taught in the pages of that book be the reason. All court related persons are taught to kick family to the curb and treat them accordingly.
The book, which was bought into wholesale by the legal and legislative communities, then formed the basis for court room and agency development. Legal minds worked overtime constructing specialized courts that violate every Constitutional principle. Again, using the emotional imaging of children, the educated public along with legislators ignored the dangerous ideas brought forth believing that the only way to protect children was by committing rights violations of parents and families.
Social constructionists including the authors of Beyond the Best Interest of the Child, began to introduce the idea that children aren’t really bonded with family through genetics and can be bonded to anyone. They taught that the younger the child, the greater the success with stranger placement. The authors encouraged the removal of babies then adopting them out quickly without due process to facilitate bonding with strangers instead of prolonged litigation.
During the time all this was going on, the United States was also working with the United Nations to develop international policy on children’s rights. The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child treaty was written with the US being primarily responsible for the contents. The treaty gives children all kinds of rights over and above parents and attempts to ensure their protection through government control. This is interesting, because at the same time the US was writing the treaty, indigenous Native American children were being removed from tribes, put in boarding homes, raped, sodomized, tortured and killed at the hands of our government. Fifty percent died from starvation and disease because of neglect. This went on to 1984.
Just recently, Florida had to enact a law that makes experimental drug use on foster children illegal. This is now 2010. Why, one might ask, is it necessary to have a law like this? Don’t fundamental human rights suggest that those ethics should already be in place? As child after child has died at the hands of pharmaceutical companies without consequence, our nation continues its propaganda that children are best protected by government control and intervention. A popular quote is that “nothing changes if nothing changes.” Simple, yet seems to apply here. The same issues of human rights violations from the 50s are still alive today.
Children are not faring better in foster care and it is unclear how most are doing in adoptive homes. The vast majority are dropping out of school and winding up in prisons. Thirty percent plus were abused in foster care. Many ended up bounced from foster home to foster home and developed serious attachment problems. Drug and alcohol issues abound with this group along with severe mental health issues. And the idea that they are no longer connected to their bio families? Try telling that to the thousands who seek each other out after the inflicted state holocaust once an adult and fall into each other's arms in tears.
Nobody really knows how children are doing in adoptive homes because the states are keeping it a secret. If an adoptive parent abuses, kills or rapes a child, it goes under “parent” in the statistics column. Adoptive parents are also backed up in courts trying to give the kids back to the states. This is not common knowledge either. I bet the violated parents or grandparents would take them.
People believe that if they call the CPS phone number on a family, then the child will be safe. Is this true or not? Most who pick up that phone believe something they have not researched. So, where does this information about child safety come from? The same people who write public policy while funding human rights violations.
The propaganda is on the radio and TV. It is distributed at the doctor’s offices and on billboards. It is offered as the only solution. Mandated reporting is everywhere and in everything the general public is required to participate in by government decree. Child care centers, dental offices, sporting events and local business, all sport sad faces of children needing help and assistance because of their atrocious poverty ridden parents who are half killing them.
Is that the truth? Only a small percentage of removed children are removed because of actual abuse. The rest are removed due to neglect with most of the evidence unsubstantiated. What does that mean? That the vast majority of children removed have no proof of abuse or neglect. Let that sink in.
Why are they focusing on parents in poverty? Are they really worse parents than those of higher incomes? The social constructionists focus on the poor who blame the poor for societal decay. The poor families pay few taxes, often use the welfare system, and tend to have educational differences that manifest itself through lineage. In public hearings before the legislators, child and family savers abound declaring Utopian ideals and ways to provide handouts or interfere in parenting rights. While people in poverty spend little time worrying about the upper classes, the upper classes avoid their own issues and problems by finger pointing to low income while targeting ways to “fix” them.
Keep in mind that the sociopaths creating wars, violating human rights, drugging people, going to countries for underage sex, and using the vulnerable for any manner of experiments all come from higher education and financial strata. There is a reason why we have the food and drug administration and it is not to protect the country from the toxic poor, but from those who would kill us all without conscience.
The Department of Defense is in the news after being exposed for 250 of their employees downloading and purchasing child porn. Only a few were investigated and convicted. The rest were ignored. How many of these people have children and was CPS called? Not likely any, because those in government positions only want to fix the poor. Looking at themselves is not part of social constructionist agenda.
Countless children are now being removed because of a husband or boyfriend who hits or abuses the mom. This is getting translated as somehow being the mom’s fault. The children get removed and adopted out. If a husband or boyfriend abuses a child when the mom is not home, the blame is also getting placed on the mother. Where are the women’s rights groups on this?
What is the government reasoning? Experts (oh boy!) are saying that children who witness domestic violence are more likely to grow up abusers and that the experience rewires their brain. And they know this how? From all the chips they are implanting without permission? Is this brain rewiring theory or fact? If fact, what means of testing this theory are they using?
Any experience that creates a paradigm shift in a person’s thinking may very well cause some brain chemistry changes to go with it. Graduating from high school, changing careers, joining the military, moving from one school to another might all qualify as brain changing activities. DV would certainly qualify as an incident or series of incidents that would affect a child’s perception. What does brain rewiring mean exactly? They don’t explain that part because they don’t know, yet they are using this as a primary weapon against the family. This is one of hundreds of obscure, unfounded reasoning excuses used to remove and adopt out children.
I had a discussion with a family therapist sent out to work with a family member. I asked her about whether they believe a child can be put down and allowed to cry for any length of time. She responded by saying that she believes that it does not harm a child to let them cry if they have been well attended to. She said that a child is taught that they are not the center of the universe and will seek more independence. She also reported that it is healthy lung development. The therapist then reported that there is division on this theory and that at least half of all other family therapists believe that a child should never be put down if they are crying but held continually. The problem is, whatever the therapist believes who is assigned to the family, that family better take on those values or get crucified in court.
Then there is the problem of observed visitations. One therapist may insist that you get down on the floor and play games with the children. Another may say if you do that you are immature. Some might say it is Ok to speak baby talk, others may say it impedes child verbal development. If a parent puts a child in time out, that may be abusive to that therapist. If a parent doesn’t put a child in timeout this may mean the parent can’t set boundaries to another. The question is this….if they don’t know how to raise children then how are they supposed to teach someone else?
If a judge orders a psychological evaluation and it is paid by the department, is the evaluator unbiased? Not from the evaluations I have seen. Mistakes abound and things get twisted in favor of the prosecution. A person can go to four different evaluators and end up with four different diagnosis even with the same information.
While the US is leaning towards the use of pseudo science psychology to base their decisions on, Israel gives the evaluators absolute power and authority and won’t do anything without an evaluation as it pertains to families. The UK has similar strategies. This is how powerful globally these associations have become, yet they can’t agree on even the simplest and most important of tasks.
What do social engineers and constructionists hope to accomplish? They want to increase the education of the children and the employability in more areas. They want to decrease religious ideology with more government dependency and values. They want fewer problems in the courts and more control on the streets. Because they have put our country in debt, they need the next generation’s taxes. Corporations want to pay lower wages while squeezing out small and medium business. Higher ups are embarrassed at low education scores and want those increased so the US looks better. More liberal special interest groups want to adopt children and take them from families and the legal system just wants federal dollars with little resistance from families when they adopt out their children to strangers. They want us all drugged, used for their purposes, controlled in every respect and don’t want our opinion about any of their behaviors. But most importantly, they want to make all the decisions regarding poor people’s children and will destroy any parent that objects while the wealthy continue to be pedophiles, rapists, murderers, embezzlers, sociopaths, drug addicts and alcoholics, perpetrators, predators of all types, and war mongers.
They accomplish all of this through constantly maintaining propaganda and reaffirming those ideals at every turn, while those who are not researching the truth become their parrots and supporters. The United States, who once was more non-authoritarian, has sustained successful social engineering in child protection advertising with the vast majority believing all the lies told, as the children and families suffer under tyranny and loss of rights. As philosophers and historians argue amongst themselves regarding control and management of the populace, one thing is clear and has been since time began. It is the poor who pays at the hands of the arrogant learned time and again.
Sorry, Martin Luther King. Your dream will not be realized any time soon.
Posted by Denise Dopkins at 9:55 PM 0 comments
Labels: children for profit, civil rights violations, CPS abuse of power, CPS horror stories, CPS legal kidnapping, Family court judges withhold due process, untruthful state agents
Friday, August 13, 2010
CPS Abuse of Power
The new racism in family court
Posted by: "Jan Smith" sunflowerinthemist2006@yahoo.com sunflowerinthemist2006
Thu Aug 12, 2010 10:40 am (PDT)
There is a new frontier and I say new, because most Caucasians aren't used to
civil rights violations as it pertains to their families. They certainly have
dished it out....consider the tribes and what they went through. In the name of
social reform and religious ideation, the white bureaucrats demolished the
native tribes taking their children, putting them in boarding homes then
"re-educated" their victims. Many never saw or heard from their families again.
As a result of legal litigation long overdue, the tribes have federal protection
- something that drives the power hungry Children's Administration who want no
barriers to child removal crazy.
The Africans faced untold terror as they were removed from their homeland, sold
into slavery, and forced to jump over brooms to get married. Often their
children were sold on the market like cattle and disappeared as frightened small
ghosts. Horrified parents would put the word out trying to find out what
happened on the information chain. Sometimes they found out, sometimes they
didn't. Many children ended up tortured and dead. Currently, they have the
"dis-proportionalit y card" and organized groups of highly educated prominent
individuals who regularly voice descent at the civil rights atrocities occurring
in their defense. Relative placement seems to be a higher priority in the black
community and bio family isn't nit picked and dissected for character defects as
much as some.
Now, it is the Caucasians turn. Not just any Caucasians though, only the poor
ones. The middle and upper classes enjoy the advantage of child removal laws
that somehow remove the risk of most government intervention. Orders are taken
from potential parents wanting to adopt. They want the blond haired blue eyed
little girls and boys and they are getting them. Relatives are regularly kicked
to the curb in favor of stranger placement and told they have no rights.
From the moment an impoverished mother steps into the Doctors office and gets a
positive pregnancy test, the games begin. Drug tests and background history
start the process of collecting evidence for the prosecution. A test for
depression is offered (please don't take it) and the subjectivity of the test
and broad ranging questions hands government intervention opportunities to them
on a silver platter. This is important to states who find themselves struggling
financially because the federal financial entitlements produce a thriving
economy using public funds and dwindling social security dollars for child
removal and adoption.
Doctors have set themselves up as an absolute legal authority. For a parent to
disagree with an offered treatment or service is failure to follow medical
advice and CPS will get called in. Hospitals can place a hold on a child for
pretty much any reason. If one misses an appointment with either a doctor or the
Women's Infants and Children program it may mean being accused of medical
neglect and child removal. The reasons for removal do not have to be imminent
danger - just a power struggle and subjective reasoning.
This puts the poorer Caucasian community in a real dilemma. Faced with more
civil rights violations both in CPS and family courts then one can count, they
find there are no laws that protect white people from subjective and erroneous
government intervention. Caucasians are in unfamiliar territory without a voice
or advocate. Perhaps it was assumed it would never be necessary but things have
evolved.
How do they justify their actions? Its all about obscure arguable reasoning that
in practice doesn't happen most of the time. One argument is children fare
better in a two parent household so they remove from single parents using that
as one of the reasons only to place with a single foster/adopt. Another is
bonding. Once a child is removed, heaven help the parent if the child even
smiles at the foster because that is deemed "bonded" and will get used against
family in a court of law.
The bonding argument is used in virtually every dependency case. They mistake
adaptation for bonding regularly never asking children their preference. As a
matter of fact, it is in writing not to. So, while the children are screaming
for their families, acting out and getting drugged to death, the caseworkers are
in the court room talking about "loving foster families" and "forever homes"
where they state the child is bonded more to the foster than the parents or
extended family. Using flowery words that look nothing like the real picture,
they destroy family after family. Perjury is the number one most protected crime
by the government in family dependency cases and is how the case goes to
termination most of the time.
The white impoverished race is in trouble with nowhere to turn except to the
very people that have been raped by the government for 200 years and know the
ropes. Because the need to change and challenge this status quo requires rapid
intervention to gain back parental and bio family rights, the races should be
working together and are not. Will they help us? They don't have to. I am hoping
that the spiritual will recognize that it is the poor of all races that are
under attack and bind together as a unified force. We can change this horrible
travesty in motion, but we need each other to do it.
Posted by Denise Dopkins at 10:49 AM 0 comments
Labels: children for profit, civil rights violations, Corrupt family court judges, corrupt social workers, CPS abuse of power, CPS horror stories, CPS legal kidnapping, Discrimination
Tuesday, March 30, 2010
Former Senator Nancy Schaefer's Death
I wish to tell the world how sad and shocked I am at the news of former Senator Schaefer and her husband's untimely and recent death. I actually feel lost without Nancy Schaefer's presence in this world. She was a very vocal advocate for parents and children trapped in the CPS/family court system. She really cared about the most innocent victims in the CPS trap. She was extremely dedicated to warning people near and far about the dangers of falling prey to the cruelties and illegalities of the corrupt CPS system. She had very little, if anything positive to say about CPS. She wrote a scathing report titled: "The Corrupt Business of Child Protective Services" where she rightfully asserts that CPS is a financial empire built upon tearing loving families apart and adopting the children out to people in the 'foster-adopt' industry. As she states in her article, the states receive financial bonuses for every child they successfully adopt out. Mrs. Schaefer said so much more about the corruption within the CPS and family court system in her report. I have posted the link to the report at the end of this post. It is really a shocking unveiling of the true intentions of the so called child welfare system.
Again, I am so saddened by the deaths of Mrs. and Mr. Schaefer. Now there are two less voices advocating against the cruelties and illegal actions of that governmental department. I also hope the mainstream media and major news papers in every part of this nation will at least mention the fact of the former senator and her husband's passing. It is very suspect that they do not get so much as a mention in local media and journalism everywhere in this nation, yet Ted Kennedy's passing was all over the news everywhere for at least several days following. I firmly believe the media is afraid to broach the subject of the Schaefer's passing due to the fact that there are thousands upon thousands of people nationwide who strongly suspect that the government had something to do with it-- namely CPS. Furthermore, the very few small news papers that have mentioned the Schaefer's passing have neglected to even touch on the fact that it is suspected that CPS had something to do with their deaths. They don't even touch on the fact that Mrs. Schaefer stood up to the corruption within CPS and the family court system. The articles ONLY speak of Mrs. Schaefer's views on subjects such as religion, the fact that she was against abortion and gay/lesbian relations, however, nothing about her advocacy for parental rights or that she went up against the wrongdoings within the CPS system. As a matter of fact, she wrote and tried to pass a bill that would have curtailed their illegalities and fraudulent ways. That cost her the senate seat she held at that time. Otherwise known as political suicide. Now she has lost her life. I do not buy the assertion the Mr. and Mrs. Schaefer had a murder-suicide pact, however, want to know if that was indeed what happened. If that is truly the cause of their deaths, I want to have concrete evidence. I suspect rather, that that is just a cover-up story. I also wish to know that no rock had been unturned in the invesigative process that is supposedly being conducted.
Following is a link to many articles by former senator Nancy Schaefer. Read 'em all... however, regarding CPS issues, please pay special attention to the following title within that list:
*UPDATED 9-25-2008 The Corrupt Business of Child Protective Services
Posted by Denise Dopkins at 3:22 PM 0 comments
Labels: Abolish CPS, abolish foster care, children for profit, Corrupt family court judges, corrupt social workers, CPS abuse of power, CPS horror stories, CPS legal kidnapping, cps reform
Sunday, March 28, 2010
The following statement was composed by Brenda Alexander, author and creator of http://www.cpsasystemoutofcontrol.blogspot.com/ in response to an article from the following website: http://current.com/news/92346048_senator-nancy-shaefer-and-husband-found-dead.htm
"I do not believe Mrs. Shaefer committed suicide or had a suicide pact with her husband. The FBI and other agencies are going to leave no rock unturned to find out what happened. Is Child Protective Services behind her death? She was very outspoken about their corruption as is Pam Roach. In fact, she committed "POLITICAL" suicide by going up against them. She was a great woman, a true warrior for parents who lost their children and she will be missed. She had 60 cases on her desk that she was working on at the time of her death. Do you really believe that she would take on these cases if she knew she was going to die soon? No. She was an honorable woman and she would never have abandoned her family. This is a tragedy. I hope they find the rat bastards who did this and give them the death sentence...and I am opposed to the death penalty!!!!"
Posted by Denise Dopkins at 5:42 PM 0 comments
Labels: children for profit, corrupt social workers, CPS abuse of power, CPS corruption, CPS legal kidnapping, cps reform
Fostering Files Left in the Street
Sunday, March 28, 2010
Fostering Files Left in the Street
Editor's Note: These people are simply brilliant! This happened in the UK but it could have just as well happened here. Social workers for CPS work there cos no one else wants them. They're incompetency is simply overwhelming.
www.thisisstaffordshire.co.uk/news/FOSTERING-FILES-LEFT-STREET/article-1949248-detail/article.html
CONFIDENTIAL information held by social services about children in care has been found on a pavement by a passer-by.
Dozens of sensitive Stoke-on-Trent City Council documents were discovered on a memory stick left in Potteries Way, Hanley, yesterday.
The social services records of foster carers, family court proceedings, parenting assessments, child custody arrangements and the psychological history of youngsters were all included in the files.
The stick was found by IT consultant Gary Fox and reported to The Sentinel before one of our reporters handed it to the council. Now officials have launched an urgent investigation into how the security breach happened.
It is not known whether the social worker had permission to take the memory stick away from the council's offices, or when it went missing.
But the information on the memory stick was not encrypted, which is against the council's own policy.
A council spokesman said: "The safety of children in our care is our priority. We have procedures for ensuring that confidential and sensitive data is kept as secure as possible.
"We will conduct a thorough investigation to determine the circumstances in which the data was lost.
"We thank The Sentinel for returning the data, as situations such as this require immediate attention. The device has been put in a safe place."
Mr Fox, who works in Hanley and lives in Stafford, had picked up the memory stick, which was covered in mud, because a blank one is worth about £10 in a shop.
The 53-year-old said: "I put the memory stick in a computer and realised there were about 40 documents on it.
"I was shocked by the vast amount of confidential information and the fact it wasn't even password protected.
"Public bodies gather information on everyone, but it seems can't be trusted to keep it safe.
"I handed the memory stick to The Sentinel, because people should be aware of how public bodies look after confidential information."
The council will report the breach to the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO), responsible for regulating the use of personal information.
An ICO spokesman said: "We may serve an enforcement notice if an organisation has failed to comply with any of the data protection principles.
"We have statutory power to impose a financial penalty if there has been a serious breach of data protection."
The security breach has shocked foster carers who rely on such confidential information being kept secure.
Carer Phyllis Hulme, aged 62, of Meir, said: "Everything to do with foster care is meant to be highly confidential.
"We are always told not to mention children's names in meetings or discuss information with anyone. Somebody has slipped up badly here."
Individual councils are responsible for creating their own data protection policies.
Posted by Denise Dopkins at 4:23 PM 0 comments
Labels: Abolish CPS, children for profit, corrupt cps, corrupt social workers, CPS abuse of power, CPS incompetency, CPS legal kidnapping
Thursday, March 11, 2010
Child Protective Services true intentions
Over the years, I have been taken to task by CPS people for calling them KIDNAPPERS.
Oh the sanctimony! "We aren't kidnapping kids. We are doing what is in their 'best interest", you see? If it weren't for us watching out for kids 'best interest' they would be getting whippings and held responsible for their actions. If it weren't for us, some kids would DIE!"
Yeah well.. Want to see the LAW about that?
18 U.S.C. § 1203 : US Code - Section 1203: Hostage taking
(a) Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, whoever, whether inside or outside the United States, seizes or detains and threatens to kill, to injure, or to continue to detain another person in order to compel a third person or a governmental organization to do or abstain from doing any act as an explicit or implicit condition for the release of the person detained, or attempts or conspires to do so, shall be punished by imprisonment for any term of years or for life and, if the death of any person results, shall be punished by death or life imprisonment.
So let's talk about the typical CPS case. What happens? CPS receives a "complaint". CPS acts on that "complaint". To "err on the side of caution", they remove the child from his/her home.
What's wrong with that?
There's the minor detail of the CHILD'S Fourth Amendment Right "to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
Why not arrest the alleged "perpetrator" instead?
Because that would be a CRIMINAL charge and the alleged perpetrator would receive his
Miranda, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendment Rights and Constitutional DUE PROCESS.
Instead, parents get dragged with no defense through the unconstitutional family court system, trying to make CPS happy so they can get their kids back. See What Happens in the Fog
The child of course has not gotten a blessed thing but his absurd new "Best Interest Civil Right".
Happily, some of this "problem" was recently addressed in the Greene v. Camreta case. So now it is "discovered" that American kids actually have Constitutional Rights that certainly overcomes the "best interest" sacred cow of European Socialism.
So what about the legal definition of Kidnapping "...detain another person in order to compel a third person or a governmental organization to do or abstain from doing any act as an explicit or implicit condition for the release of the person detained, or attempts or conspires to do so.."
Well bunkie, what do you think about volunteering your Constitutional Rights away to "cooperate" with CPS and signing a Safety Plan?
These monsters aren't going to GIVE you your Constitutional Rights. If you don't KNOW your Constitutional Rights and DEMAND them, you are a slave.
In US. vs. Johnson, 76 F.Supp. 538, 540 (1947), Federal District Court Judge James Alger Fee ruled that-
"The privilege against self-incrimination is neither accorded to the passive resistant, nor to the person who is ignorant of his rights, nor to one indifferent thereto. It is a FIGHTING clause. It's benefits can be retained only by sustained COMBAT. It cannot be claimed by attorney or solicitor. It is valid only when insisted upon by a BELLIGERENT claimant in person." McAlister vs. Henkel, 201 U.S. 90, 26 S.Ct. 385, 50 L. Ed. 671; Commonwealth vs. Shaw, 4 Cush. 594, 50 Am.Dec. 813; Orum vs. State, 38 Ohio App. 171, 175 N.E. 876. "The one who is persuaded by honeyed words or moral suasion to testify or produce documents rather than make a last ditch stand, simply loses the protection. . . . He must refuse to answer or produce, and test the matter in contempt proceedings, or by habeas corpus."
“A slave is one who waits for someone to come and free him.” -Ezra Pound
COMMENT on this story at AFRA's new "Intense Debate" page
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Better be wise by the misfortunes of others than by your own." --Aesop (c. 550 B.C.) legendary Greek fabulist
If CPS hasn't attacked YOUR FAMILY yet, see If you are ever approached by anyone from social services.... and WHEN THEY COME AFTER YOU
Learn as much as you can, as fast as you can at "How To Fight CPS"-
http://familyrights.us/how_to/fight_cps.html
Get YOUR VERSION OF HISTORY ON THE RECORD with your Sworn Affidavit-
http://familyrights.us/bin/FORMS/sworn_affidavit.html
Leonard Henderson, co-founder
American Family Rights Association
http://familyrights.us
"Until Every Child Comes Home" ©
"The Voice of America's Families" ©
Have you seen AFRA News Today?
http://familyrights.us/news
I am not a lawyer and I do not pretend to give legal advice. If you need legal advice, see AFRA's Lawyer Friends who certainly are not pretenders (http://familyrights.us/info/law) I merely relate the things I learned in the past that seemed to work in my own case or things that others have related to me that worked in their cases. I provide information for free and do not expect to receive any form of payment or reward on this side of heaven. Therefore, DO NOT rely on this information as legal advice. Real Legal advice would come from a real lawyer who hates CPS and prepares a VIGOROUS DEFENSE against a negative (proving nothing happened) instead an ATTORNEY (http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/attorn) talking you into a plea bargain (http://familyrights.us/bin/The_Problem_with_Plea_Bargaining.htm)
Posted by Denise Dopkins at 11:45 AM 0 comments
Labels: children for profit, corrupt cps, Corrupt family court judges, corrupt foster care, CPS abuse of power, CPS abusive policies, CPS horror stories, CPS legal kidnapping, cps reform
Monday, March 1, 2010
Nancy Schaefer on CPS Corruption
Nancy Schaefer on CPS Corruption
Nancy Schaefer speaking out on CPS Corruption on Alex Jones Radio show.
Below are the links to the videos on YouTube...
Part 1 - www.youtube.com/watch?v=IOx5Q5ekPxk&feature=player_embedded
Part 2 - www.youtube.com/watch?v=TfWEQEm9GJk&feature=player_embedded
Part 3 - www.youtube.com/watch?v=V1HnWqy_0yM&feature=player_embedded
Part 4 - www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dg-N9tT6OtY&feature=player_embedded
Feel free to pass along - we need to get the word out!!!!
Posted by Denise Dopkins at 7:09 AM 0 comments
Labels: children for profit, civil rights violations, corrupt social workers, CPS abuse of power, CPS fraudulent adoptions, CPS horror stories, CPS legal kidnapping, Family court judges withhold due process
Sunday, February 28, 2010
Senators deem CPS as corrupt
Larry Holland on 'Get Your Justice Live' reports:
Washington Senator Pam Roach and Former Senator Nancy Schaefer: “CPS is Corrupt”
Lary Holland04.29.09Campaigns, Congress, Judicial Oversight, Parental Rights, Political and Advocate Tools, Programs and Resources, educational, Child Protective Services, Child Welfare Laws, CPS, CPS Abuse, CPS Neglect, Eagle Forum, Georgia, Nancy Schaefer, Nancy Schaefer Report, Pam Roach, Pam Roach Report, Senate, Washington13 CommentsWe were joined by two very special guests to discuss Child Protective Services and Parental Rights. Although these two notable figures live great distances apart, their noble goals are remarkably similar. Nancy Schaefer and Pam Roach made special appearances on Get Your Justice Live Wednesday April 29, 2009. A common theme that both leaders agreed on is that “CPS is Corrupt.”
Play in Popup
Nancy Schaefer is president of Eagle Forum of Georgia. She served in the Georgia State Senate for four years. She has been a staunch defender of parents’ rights and will also assume the position of Eagle Forum’s National Chairman of Parents’ Rights. She is president of Family Concerns, Inc. and represented Eagle Forum at the Untied Nations conferences in Beijing, Istanbul, Rome and New York. Nancy Schaefer is well-known for a scathing report titled “The Corrupt Business of Child Protective Services” that was originally released on November 16, 2007 and later updated on September 25, 2008. (Download Available)
State Senator Pam Roach continues to serve in the Washington State Senate for 19 years. In the year 2000, Senator Roach and her son Representative Dan Roach became the first mother/son duo to represent the same district at the same time. Throughout her years of service she has represented the U.S. in East Timor for the International Republican Institute; hosted a radio talk show on KIRO in Seattle; and is founder of an NGO in Honduras among other accomplishments. As Judiciary chair she authored landmark bills on juvenile justice and DUI. Senator Roach chaired the Children and Family Services Committee and continues to advocate for children and parental rights. This year Senator Roach chaired a special legislative committee to shine light on the lack of accountability and trampling of parental rights by the Child Protective Services. She continues to demand accountability within Child Protective Services today.
——————————————-
You can learn more about Eagle Forum by visiting their website at http://www.eagleforum.org and also find additional resources pertaining to the Pam Roach Report at http://pamroachreport.blogspot.com. By referring your own legislators to these resources, organizations, and interviews you can supplement your own voice and positions about the “Corrupt Business of Child Protective Services” and establish a higher burden of proof on the various state programs before they are able to burgeon your family.
No matter which way you look at it, former Georgia Senator Nancy Schaefer as well as Washington State Senator Pam Roach believe that “Parental Rights Should Be Respected and Protected By All” and the great need for Child Protective Services to come under greater scrutiny of the general public.Please take a listen and spread the word.
Posted by Denise Dopkins at 7:13 PM 0 comments
Labels: Corrupt family court judges, corrupt social workers, CPS corruption, CPS fraudulent adoptions, CPS horror stories, CPS legal kidnapping, Washington State DCFS corruption
Tuesday, February 9, 2010
'Move On'
The moment my parental rights were verbally terminated, my Spokane County public defender Mark Callen set up a meeting with my CPS contracted mental health therapist. He did this without consulting with me first. He further emailed me and basically ordered me to attend. During the meeting, Mr. Callen and my therapist Carla Paullin attempted to persuade me to not appeal the termination ruling. They informed me that I should just 'move on' with my life and 'continue to make progress'. Fascinatingly enough, I have been advised by some of my friends to do the same. I guess my question to anyone who so freely gives this advice is-- what exactly does 'move on' mean to them? Would they encourage a parent to move on if their child had been kidnapped by anyone other than CPS? Would they not want to see the kidnappers imprisoned and punished for the crime? Should it not be the same punishment for state agents, judges and court commissioners who illegally detain children from their parents?
I met a woman named Michelle Magers approximately 4 years ago during my nightmare with CPS. She was doing some kind of assignment for her schooling to become involved in social work. Little did I realize at that time that she was heading for CPS social work. Ms. Magers interviewed me to include in a paper she was composing and the title of the article was "From the Parent's Perspective". In the article, several parents involved with CPS spoke about their experience. Most of the interviews spoke negatively about CPS. I think there was one that spoke even remotely positive about CPS. To make a long story short... Ms. Magers, in my opinion, pretended to be a friend and support to me during my nightmare with CPS. She spent hours with me. We played board games, went for coffee, talked about my case, etc. She listened to me share with her the deep pain I was suffering at the hand of CPS and "family court". She listened as I talked about my frustrations at the constant contradictory messages I was receiving from CPS social workers, Guardian ad litems, CPS contracted "treatment providers" and even the Court Commissioner and judges involved in my case. She listened to me talk about the confusion that was caused purposely by all the players in my case. I talked with her about the oppressive conditions under which me and my son Micah were allowed to visit... and the severe lack of time I was allowed with him. In short, I confided my deepest secrets and feelings to Ms. Magers. She paid lip service to my feelings and frustrations, and in the end dropped me like a deadly disease once my parental rights were terminated. Once CPS mission was accomplished, she was finished playing friend to me. I feel very violated and wounded by Michelle Magers. In my opinion, and by all appearances, she played me like a violin. I believe she shared all of my secrets with the CPS social workers and CASA workers. I believe this because immediately upon the termination of my parental rights, she suddenly deserted me. She no longer contacted me like she did prior to the termination of my parental rights. She even changed her whole tune about what CPS was all about.
Prior to the termination of my parental rights, Ms. Magers would, as I stated before, pay lip service to my grief and frustrations with CPS. She even said some nasty things about the social worker, Guardian ad litem and one of the 'treatment providers'. She said she didn't think the social worker deserved to be a social worker. She agreed with me when I stated that CPS was crooked and oppressive. She had very little positive if any at all to say about CPS or family court. I recall a conversation I held with her after my parental rights were terminated. She completely changed her position on CPS. She informed me that if CPS clients did what CPS told them to do-- then they would regain custody of their children. She seemed so cold and indifferent to me. She seemed rather pompous in her tone. It seemed as if my worse fear was brought to fruition. Ms. Magers had played me for a fool, taking advantage of my need to really trust someone and confide in her. I feel she led me to believe she was my friend and sympathetic to my situation. I believe she made a regular practice of relaying my innermost feelings and thoughts to the social worker, Guardian ad litem, treatment providers, lawyers and so forth. All of those people in turn used and abused this information, twisting and turning it and blowing it out of proportion in their reports to the court. I feel Ms. Magers abused my trust in her and used it against me. I feel so stupid for having trusted her in the first place. I am sad it turned out the way it did between her and me.
I ran into Ms. Magers a year or so after my parental rights were terminated. She appeared somewhat friendly and again led me to believe she wanted to be in contact with me. I asked her to remind me of her phone number and I would call her. She responded by informing me she still had my phone number and would call me. As a matter of fact, she stated that she had been thinking about me and how I was doing. Apparently she was not that interested because she has never called me since that day I ran into her back in March of 2009. I suspect she doesn't want to be known to associate with me as long as she works with CPS. Almost immediately after my parental rights were terminated, Ms. Magers began trying to impress upon me that I should 'move on' with my life. The same tune I heard from my own defense attorney and CPS contracted counselor... (who also happened to desert me almost immediately after the termination of my parental rights.) She saw me just a few more times after that and then dropped me as a client. No more money from the state... no more seeing the client. How cold and calculated is that?!
I genuinely invite anyone to explain to me their definition of 'move on'. Does that mean that the parent should just sail off into the wild blue yonder and live as if this tragedy never happened to them and their children? Does it mean that those parents wounded by the unreasonable and even illegal actions of state agents should not work to affect change in the child welfare system? Does 'move on' mean that the parent should be silent and not warn the general public of the dangers of becoming entrapped by CPS? Yes... I said entrapped.
Posted by Denise Dopkins at 7:23 PM 0 comments
Labels: children for profit, civil rights violations, CPS abuse of power, CPS legal kidnapping, Family court judges withhold due process
